∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›Power rule›Problem 2.176

Derivative of \( \displaystyle 12 x \left(x^{2} + 3 x + 3\right) \)

Problem 2.176 · hard Beautiful

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = 12 x \left(x^{2} + 3 x + 3\right) \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} 12 x \left(x^{2} + 3 x + 3\right) \]
    derivativeStart with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = 12 \frac{d}{d x} x \left(x^{2} + 3 x + 3\right) \]
    constant-multiplePull out the constant factor 12.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = 12 x \frac{d}{d x} \left(x^{2} + 3 x + 3\right) + 12 \left(x^{2} + 3 x + 3\right) \frac{d}{d x} x \]
    productApply the product rule.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = 12 x^{2} + 12 x \left(\frac{d}{d x} 3 + \frac{d}{d x} 3 x + \frac{d}{d x} x^{2}\right) + 36 x + 36 \]
    sumApply the sum rule to the terms inside the parentheses.✓ Proved
  5. \[ = 12 x^{2} + 12 x \left(2 x + 3\right) + 36 x + 36 \]
    derivative algebraDifferentiate each term individually. Simplify the expression inside the parentheses.✓ Proved
  6. \[ = 36 x^{2} + 72 x + 36 \]
    algebra algebra simplifyDistribute x into the parentheses. Combine like terms. Distribute the 12 to get the final simplified form.✓ Proved
Answer \( 36 \left(x + 1\right)^{2} \)

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
7✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
8✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
9✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • deepseek-r1:70b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (15)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-20
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-20
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-20 — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules and algebraic simplifications. Each step changes only one aspect of the expression and uses valid labels from the fixed vocabulary.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-20
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-19 — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules step-by-step, adhering to the one-change-per-step constraint and using valid labels from the fixed vocabulary.
  • deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-19
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-19
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-19
  • deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-19
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-19
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-18 — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules step-by-step, adhering to the one-change-per-step constraint. The labels accurately reflect the operations performed.
  • deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-18
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-18
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-17
  • deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-17

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-26 with SymPy 1.14.0.