∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›Product rule›Problem 2.1743

Derivative of \( \displaystyle \frac{x^{2}}{2} - \frac{x}{2} + \left(- x^{2} + x - \frac{1}{4}\right) \ln{\left(2 x - 1 \right)} \)

Problem 2.1743 · hard

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = \frac{x^{2}}{2} - \frac{x}{2} + \left(- x^{2} + x - \frac{1}{4}\right) \ln{\left(2 x - 1 \right)} \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(\frac{x^{2}}{2} - \frac{x}{2} + \left(- x^{2} + x - \frac{1}{4}\right) \ln{\left(2 x - 1 \right)}\right) \]
    derivativeStart with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = - \frac{d}{d x} \frac{x}{2} + \frac{d}{d x} \frac{x^{2}}{2} + \frac{d}{d x} \left(- x^{2} + x - \frac{1}{4}\right) \ln{\left(2 x - 1 \right)} \]
    sumApply the sum rule.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \left(- x^{2} + x - \frac{1}{4}\right) \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(2 x - 1 \right)} + \ln{\left(2 x - 1 \right)} \frac{d}{d x} \left(- x^{2} + x - \frac{1}{4}\right) - \frac{d}{d x} \frac{x}{2} + \frac{d}{d x} \frac{x^{2}}{2} \]
    productApply the product rule to the third term.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = \left(1 - 2 x\right) \ln{\left(2 x - 1 \right)} + \left(- x^{2} + x - \frac{1}{4}\right) \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(2 x - 1 \right)} - \frac{d}{d x} \frac{x}{2} + \frac{d}{d x} \frac{x^{2}}{2} \]
    derivativeDifferentiate the polynomial part.✓ Proved
  5. \[ = \left(1 - 2 x\right) \ln{\left(2 x - 1 \right)} - \frac{d}{d x} \frac{x}{2} + \frac{d}{d x} \frac{x^{2}}{2} + \frac{\left(- x^{2} + x - \frac{1}{4}\right) \frac{d}{d x} \left(2 x - 1\right)}{2 x - 1} \]
    chainApply the chain rule to the logarithm.✓ Proved
  6. \[ = \left(1 - 2 x\right) \ln{\left(2 x - 1 \right)} - \frac{d}{d x} \frac{x}{2} + \frac{d}{d x} \frac{x^{2}}{2} + \frac{2 \left(- x^{2} + x - \frac{1}{4}\right)}{2 x - 1} \]
    derivativeDifferentiate the inner function 2x - 1.✓ Proved
  7. \[ = \left(1 - 2 x\right) \ln{\left(2 x - 1 \right)} - \frac{d}{d x} \frac{x}{2} + \frac{d}{d x} \frac{x^{2}}{2} + \frac{- 2 x^{2} + 2 x - \frac{1}{2}}{2 x - 1} \]
    algebraSimplify the fraction.✓ Proved
  8. \[ = x + \left(1 - 2 x\right) \ln{\left(2 x - 1 \right)} - \frac{1}{2} + \frac{- 2 x^{2} + 2 x - \frac{1}{2}}{2 x - 1} \]
    derivative algebraDifferentiate the first two terms. Distribute the 2 in the numerator.✓ Proved
  9. \[ = x + \left(1 - 2 x\right) \ln{\left(2 x - 1 \right)} - \frac{1}{2} + \frac{- 4 x^{2} + 4 x - 1}{4 x - 2} \]
    algebraMultiply numerator and denominator by 2 to clear the fraction.✓ Proved
  10. \[ = x + \left(1 - 2 x\right) \ln{\left(2 x - 1 \right)} - \frac{1}{2} - \frac{4 x^{2} - 4 x + 1}{4 x - 2} \]
    algebraFactor out the negative sign.✓ Proved
  11. \[ = x + \left(1 - 2 x\right) \ln{\left(2 x - 1 \right)} - \frac{\left(2 x - 1\right)^{2}}{4 x - 2} - \frac{1}{2} \]
    algebraRecognize the perfect square trinomial.✓ Proved
  12. \[ = \left(1 - 2 x\right) \ln{\left(2 x - 1 \right)} \]
    algebra algebra simplifyCancel the common factor (2*x - 1). Split the fraction. Combine all terms to get the final answer.✓ Proved
Answer \( \left(1 - 2 x\right) \ln{\left(2 x - 1 \right)} \)

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 2*x - 1 = 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 2*x - 1 = 0
7✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 2*x - 1 = 0
8✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 2*x - 1 = 0
9✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 2*x - 1 = 0
10✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 2*x - 1 = 0
undefined where 4*x - 2 = 0
11✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 4*x - 2 = 0
12✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 4*x - 2 = 0
13✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 4*x - 2 = 0
14✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
15✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules and algebraic simplifications in single-step increments. The labels used are appropriate for the operations performed, and the final result matches the stated answer.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-07
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-07 — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules and algebraic simplifications in single-step increments. The labels used are appropriate for the operations performed, and the final result matches the stated answer.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-07
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-07 — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules and algebraic simplifications in single-step increments. All labels are appropriate for the operations performed.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-07 with SymPy 1.14.0.