∫Calc Practice

Derivative rules from a table of values

Problem 2.1650 · easy

Use the table to find \( \displaystyle h'(2) \) for \( \displaystyle h(x) = - 2 f(x) - 3 g(x) \). \[ \begin{array}{c|cccc} x & f(x) & f'(x) & g(x) & g'(x) \\ \hline 2 & -2 & -1 & -1 & 4\end{array} \]
  1. Constant multiples and sums differentiate term by term.
    Reviewed
  2. \[ \left(-3\right) 4 - 2 \left(-1\right) = -10 \]
    Read the values from the table and substitute.✓ Proved
Answer \( h'(2) = -10 \)

✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 1 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Reviewedreviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlxa sentence; read, not computed
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0differentiated concrete polynomials built to match the table

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies the linearity of differentiation and substitutes the values from the table accurately.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-05 — The solution correctly applies the linearity of differentiation and substitutes the values from the table accurately.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-05
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-05 — The solution correctly applies the linearity of differentiation and substitutes the values from the table accurately.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-05

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/derivative_from_table, checked 2026-10-05 with SymPy 1.14.0.