Derivative of \( \displaystyle 3 \sqrt{\left(x + 2\right)^{2} + 1} \)
Problem 2.155 · medium
Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = 3 \sqrt{\left(x + 2\right)^{2} + 1} \).
- \[ \frac{d}{d x} 3 \sqrt{\left(x + 2\right)^{2} + 1} \]derivativeStart with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
- \[ = 3 \frac{d}{d x} \sqrt{\left(x + 2\right)^{2} + 1} \]constant-multiple rewritePull the constant factor out of the derivative. Rewrite the square root as a fractional power.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{3 \frac{d}{d x} \left(\left(x + 2\right)^{2} + 1\right)}{2 \sqrt{\left(x + 2\right)^{2} + 1}} \]chainApply the chain rule.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{3 \left(2 x + 4\right)}{2 \sqrt{\left(x + 2\right)^{2} + 1}} \]derivative simplifyDifferentiate the inner function. Simplify the derivative of the inner term.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{3 x + 6}{\sqrt{\left(x + 2\right)^{2} + 1}} \]algebra rewriteCancel the 2 and the 1/2. Rewrite the negative exponent as a fraction.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{3 \left(x + 2\right)}{\sqrt{\left(x + 2\right)^{2} + 1}} \)
Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | line 1 is the problem as stated |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where (x + 2)**2 + 1 = 0 |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where (x + 2)**2 + 1 = 0 |
| 6 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where (x + 2)**2 + 1 = 0 |
| 7 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where (x + 2)**2 + 1 = 0 |
| 8 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where (x + 2)**2 + 1 = 0 |
| answer | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where (x + 2)**2 + 1 = 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) — Step 4 applies both the power rule and the chain rule in one go, violating the rule‑granularity requirement. Each step must change only one thing using a single named rule.deepseek-r1:70b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (15)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-20gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-09-20 — Step 4 applies both the power rule and the chain rule in one go, violating the rule‑granularity requirement. Each step must change only one thing using a single named rule.qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-20gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-20qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-19deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-19gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-19qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-19deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-19gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-19qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-18deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-18gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-18gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-17deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-17
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-26 with SymPy 1.14.0.