∫Calc Practice

The derivative from the limit definition

Problem 2.1532 · medium

Use the limit definition of the derivative to find \( \displaystyle f'(x) \) for \( \displaystyle f(x) = 2 x - 5 \), then find \( \displaystyle f'(2) \).
  1. By definition f′(x) = lim_{h→0} [f(x + h) − f(x)]/h.
    Reviewed
  2. \[ 2 h + 2 x - 5 \]
    Write out f(x + h).✓ Proved
  3. \[ 2 \]
    Combine and cancel the factor h.✓ Proved
  4. \[ \lim_{h \to 0^+} 2 = 2 \]
    Now h → 0 by direct substitution.✓ Proved
  5. \[ \left. 2 \right|_{\substack{ x=2 }} = 2 \]
    At x = 2.✓ Proved
Answer \( f'(x) = 2,\ f'(2) = 2 \)

Lines: 4 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Reviewedreviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlxa sentence; read, not computed
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0matches the derivative by the power, quotient and chain rules

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies the limit definition of the derivative to a linear function and evaluates the result at x=2. The steps are logically sound and the algebraic simplifications are correct.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-04 — The solution correctly applies the limit definition of the derivative to a linear function and evaluates the result at x=2. The steps are logically sound and the algebraic simplifications are correct.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-04
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-04 — The solution fails to explicitly form the difference quotient [f(x+h) - f(x)]/h. It jumps from writing f(x+h) to the result 2, skipping the subtraction of f(x) and division by h, which are the core steps of the limit definition.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-10-04 — Step 2 incorrectly writes f(x+h) as 2*h+2*x-5 but then fails to subtract f(x). The correct numerator is 2h, not the expression shown. The subsequent cancellation and limit are based on a faulty expression.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/derivative_definition, checked 2026-10-04 with SymPy 1.14.0.