∫Calc Practice

Derivative of \( \displaystyle - \frac{\ln{\left(\tan{\left(2 x \right)} + \sec{\left(2 x \right)} \right)}}{2} \)

Problem 2.1519 · hard

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = - \frac{\ln{\left(\tan{\left(2 x \right)} + \sec{\left(2 x \right)} \right)}}{2} \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{\ln{\left(\tan{\left(2 x \right)} + \sec{\left(2 x \right)} \right)}}{2}\right) \]
    Start with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = - \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(\tan{\left(2 x \right)} + \sec{\left(2 x \right)} \right)}}{2} \]
    constant-multiplePull out the constant factor.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = - \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \left(\tan{\left(2 x \right)} + \sec{\left(2 x \right)}\right)}{2 \left(\tan{\left(2 x \right)} + \sec{\left(2 x \right)}\right)} \]
    logarithmicApply the chain rule for the natural logarithm.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = - \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \tan{\left(2 x \right)} + \frac{d}{d x} \sec{\left(2 x \right)}}{2 \left(\tan{\left(2 x \right)} + \sec{\left(2 x \right)}\right)} \]
    sumDifferentiate the sum inside the parentheses.✓ Proved
  5. \[ = - \frac{2 \tan{\left(2 x \right)} \sec{\left(2 x \right)} + 2 \sec^{2}{\left(2 x \right)}}{2 \left(\tan{\left(2 x \right)} + \sec{\left(2 x \right)}\right)} \]
    trigApply the derivatives of tangent and secant.✓ Proved
  6. \[ = - \frac{\tan{\left(2 x \right)} \sec{\left(2 x \right)} + \sec^{2}{\left(2 x \right)}}{\tan{\left(2 x \right)} + \sec{\left(2 x \right)}} \]
    constant-multipleFactor out the constant 2.✓ Proved
  7. \[ = \frac{- \tan{\left(2 x \right)} \sec{\left(2 x \right)} - \sec^{2}{\left(2 x \right)}}{\tan{\left(2 x \right)} + \sec{\left(2 x \right)}} \]
    algebraSimplify the expression by canceling the 2 and the 1/2.✓ Proved
  8. \[ = - \sec{\left(2 x \right)} \]
    algebra simplifyFactor out sec(2*x) from the numerator. Cancel the common term in the numerator and denominator.✓ Proved
Answer \( - \frac{1}{\cos{\left(2 x \right)}} \)
Mind the domain. The answer is also defined at points where f(x) is not. Substituting there gives a number that is not a slope of f.

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
tan has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
sec has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
tan has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
sec has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
undefined where tan(2*x) + sec(2*x) = 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
tan has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
sec has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
undefined where tan(2*x) + sec(2*x) = 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
tan has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
sec has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
undefined where tan(2*x) + sec(2*x) = 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
tan has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
sec has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
undefined where tan(2*x) + sec(2*x) = 0
7✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
tan has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
sec has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
undefined where tan(2*x) + sec(2*x) = 0
8✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
tan has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
sec has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
undefined where tan(2*x) + sec(2*x) = 0
9✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
sec has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where cos(2*x) = 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules and algebraic simplifications. Each step changes only one aspect of the expression, and the labels accurately reflect the operations performed.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-04 — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules and algebraic simplifications. Each step changes only one aspect of the expression, and the labels accurately reflect the operations performed.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-04
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-04
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-10-04 — [domain objection, downgraded to style] Step 1 uses an undefined rule label "unlabelled"; it should be labeled "derivative".

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-04 with SymPy 1.14.0.