∫Calc Practice

Derivative of \( \displaystyle - x + \left(x + \frac{1}{3}\right) \ln{\left(3 x + 1 \right)} \)

Problem 2.1516 · hard Beautiful

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = - x + \left(x + \frac{1}{3}\right) \ln{\left(3 x + 1 \right)} \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(- x + \left(x + \frac{1}{3}\right) \ln{\left(3 x + 1 \right)}\right) \]
    derivativeStart with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = \frac{d}{d x} \left(- x\right) + \frac{d}{d x} \left(x + \frac{1}{3}\right) \ln{\left(3 x + 1 \right)} \]
    sumApply the sum rule.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \left(x + \frac{1}{3}\right) \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(3 x + 1 \right)} + \ln{\left(3 x + 1 \right)} \frac{d}{d x} \left(x + \frac{1}{3}\right) + \frac{d}{d x} \left(- x\right) \]
    productApply the product rule to the second term.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = \left(x + \frac{1}{3}\right) \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(3 x + 1 \right)} + \ln{\left(3 x + 1 \right)} + \frac{d}{d x} \left(- x\right) \]
    derivativeDifferentiate the term (x + 1/3).✓ Proved
  5. \[ = \frac{\left(x + \frac{1}{3}\right) \frac{d}{d x} \left(3 x + 1\right)}{3 x + 1} + \ln{\left(3 x + 1 \right)} + \frac{d}{d x} \left(- x\right) \]
    chainApply the chain rule to the logarithm.✓ Proved
  6. \[ = \frac{3 \left(x + \frac{1}{3}\right)}{3 x + 1} + \ln{\left(3 x + 1 \right)} + \frac{d}{d x} \left(- x\right) \]
    derivativeDifferentiate the inner function 3*x + 1.✓ Proved
  7. \[ = \frac{3 \left(x + \frac{1}{3}\right)}{3 x + 1} + \ln{\left(3 x + 1 \right)} - 1 \]
    derivativeEvaluate the derivatives of the remaining terms.✓ Proved
  8. \[ = \ln{\left(3 x + 1 \right)} \]
    algebra simplify simplifyDistribute the 3 in the numerator. Simplify the fraction. Final simplification.✓ Proved
Answer \( \ln{\left(3 x + 1 \right)} \)

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 3*x + 1 = 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 3*x + 1 = 0
7✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 3*x + 1 = 0
8✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where 3*x + 1 = 0
9✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
10✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules step-by-step, adhering to the one-change-per-step constraint. The labels used are appropriate for the operations performed.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-04 — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules step-by-step, adhering to the one-change-per-step constraint. The labels used are appropriate for the operations performed.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-04
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-04
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-04

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-04 with SymPy 1.14.0.