Derivative of \( \displaystyle x \operatorname{atan}{\left(x \right)} - \frac{\ln{\left(x^{2} + 1 \right)}}{2} \)
Problem 2.1485 · hard Beautiful
Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = x \operatorname{atan}{\left(x \right)} - \frac{\ln{\left(x^{2} + 1 \right)}}{2} \).
- \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(x \operatorname{atan}{\left(x \right)} - \frac{\ln{\left(x^{2} + 1 \right)}}{2}\right) \]derivativeStart with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{d}{d x} x \operatorname{atan}{\left(x \right)} - \frac{d}{d x} \frac{\ln{\left(x^{2} + 1 \right)}}{2} \]sumApply the sum rule.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{d}{d x} x \operatorname{atan}{\left(x \right)} - \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(x^{2} + 1 \right)}}{2} \]constantPull out the constant factor.✓ Proved
- \[ = x \frac{d}{d x} \operatorname{atan}{\left(x \right)} + \operatorname{atan}{\left(x \right)} \frac{d}{d x} x - \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(x^{2} + 1 \right)}}{2} \]productApply the product rule to the first term.✓ Proved
- \[ = x \frac{d}{d x} \operatorname{atan}{\left(x \right)} + \operatorname{atan}{\left(x \right)} - \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(x^{2} + 1 \right)}}{2} \]derivative simplifyDifferentiate x. Simplify the expression.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{x}{x^{2} + 1} + \operatorname{atan}{\left(x \right)} - \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(x^{2} + 1 \right)}}{2} \]inverse-trig algebraDifferentiate the arctangent function. Simplify the fraction.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{x}{x^{2} + 1} + \operatorname{atan}{\left(x \right)} - \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \left(x^{2} + 1\right)}{2 \left(x^{2} + 1\right)} \]chainApply the chain rule to the logarithm.✓ Proved
- \[ = \operatorname{atan}{\left(x \right)} \]derivative algebra algebra simplifyDifferentiate the inner function x**2 + 1. Simplify the product. Combine the fractions. Simplify the final result.✓ Proved
Answer \( \operatorname{atan}{\left(x \right)} \)
✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | line 1 is the problem as stated |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 6 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 7 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments undefined where x**2 + 1 = 0 |
| 8 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments undefined where x**2 + 1 = 0 |
| 9 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments undefined where x**2 + 1 = 0 |
| 10 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where x**2 + 1 = 0 |
| 11 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 12 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 13 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| answer | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules one at a time with appropriate labels. Each step changes only one aspect of the expression, and the final result is correct.
Every verdict on record (4)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-04 — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules one at a time with appropriate labels. Each step changes only one aspect of the expression, and the final result is correct.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-04qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-04 — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules step-by-step, adhering to the one-change-per-step constraint and using valid labels from the fixed vocabulary.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-04
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-04 with SymPy 1.14.0.