∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›Chain rule›Problem 2.1357

Derivative of \( \displaystyle - \frac{x}{2} + \frac{\sin{\left(10 x \right)}}{20} \)

Problem 2.1357 · hard

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = - \frac{x}{2} + \frac{\sin{\left(10 x \right)}}{20} \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{x}{2} + \frac{\sin{\left(10 x \right)}}{20}\right) \]
    Start with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{x}{2}\right) + \frac{d}{d x} \frac{\sin{\left(10 x \right)}}{20} \]
    sumApply the sum rule.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{x}{2}\right) + \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \sin{\left(10 x \right)}}{20} \]
    constant-multiple constant-multipleFactor out the constant 1/20. Factor out the constant -1/2.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = - \frac{\frac{d}{d x} x}{2} + \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \sin{\left(10 x \right)}}{20} \]
    constant-multiple✓ Proved
  5. \[ = \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \sin{\left(10 x \right)}}{20} - \frac{1}{2} \]
    derivative simplifyDifferentiate x. Simplify the first term.✓ Proved
  6. \[ = \frac{\cos{\left(10 x \right)} \frac{d}{d x} 10 x}{20} - \frac{1}{2} \]
    trigDifferentiate sin(10*x) using the chain rule.✓ Proved
  7. \[ = \frac{\cos{\left(10 x \right)}}{2} - \frac{1}{2} \]
    chain algebra simplifyDifferentiate 10*x. Multiply the constants. Simplify the final expression.✓ Proved
Answer \( - \sin^{2}{\left(5 x \right)} \)

Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. A reviewer's objection to the explanation stands; see the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
7✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
8✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
9✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
10✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
11✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (misleading) — Step 8 incorrectly labels the chain rule as "trig" and step 9 incorrectly labels the derivative of a linear function as "chain". The correct labels are: step 8 – "chain", step 9 – "derivative". This mislabeling could teach students the wrong rule names.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — The final result is mathematically incorrect; the derivative of -x/2 is -1/2, but the stated answer is -sin(5*x)^2. Additionally, Step 8 mislabels the application of the chain rule as 'trig'.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-03 — The final result is mathematically incorrect; the derivative of -x/2 is -1/2, but the stated answer is -sin(5*x)^2. Additionally, Step 8 mislabels the application of the chain rule as 'trig'.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (misleading) 2026-10-03 — Step 8 incorrectly labels the chain rule as "trig" and step 9 incorrectly labels the derivative of a linear function as "chain". The correct labels are: step 8 – "chain", step 9 – "derivative". This mislabeling could teach students the wrong rule names.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-30 — The final answer is mathematically incorrect; the derivative of -x/2 + sin(10x)/20 is -1/2 + cos(10x)/2, not -sin(5x)^2. Additionally, step 8 mislabels the application of the chain rule as 'trig'.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-09-30 — Step 8 applies both the trig rule (derivative of sin) and the chain rule in a single step, violating the rule that each step must change only one thing. The label "trig" is also misleading because the chain rule is also applied here.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-03 with SymPy 1.14.0.