∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›Chain rule›Problem 2.1071

Derivative of \( \displaystyle - \operatorname{asin}{\left(x \right)} \)

Problem 2.1071 · medium

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = - \operatorname{asin}{\left(x \right)} \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \operatorname{asin}{\left(x \right)}\right) \]
    derivativeStart with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = - \frac{d}{d x} \operatorname{asin}{\left(x \right)} \]
    constantPull the constant factor out of the derivative.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = - \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - x^{2}}} \]
    derivativeApply the derivative rule for arcsine.✓ Proved
Answer \( - \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - x^{2}}} \)

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
asin is real only on [-1, 1]
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
asin is real only on [-1, 1]
undefined where 1 - x**2 = 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 1 - x**2 = 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) — Step 2 incorrectly labels the application of the derivative of arcsine as a "constant" rule; it should be labeled "derivative". The step does not apply two rules at once, but the label misidentifies the rule used.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-28
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-09-28 — Step 2 incorrectly labels the application of the derivative of arcsine as a "constant" rule; it should be labeled "derivative". The step does not apply two rules at once, but the label misidentifies the rule used.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-28
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-28

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-28 with SymPy 1.14.0.