∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›Chain rule›Problem 2.1017

Derivative of \( \displaystyle \frac{3 x}{2} - \frac{3 \sin{\left(2 x + 2 \right)}}{4} \)

Problem 2.1017 · hard

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = \frac{3 x}{2} - \frac{3 \sin{\left(2 x + 2 \right)}}{4} \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(\frac{3 x}{2} - \frac{3 \sin{\left(2 x + 2 \right)}}{4}\right) \]
    Start with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = \frac{d}{d x} \frac{3 x}{2} - \frac{d}{d x} \frac{3 \sin{\left(2 x + 2 \right)}}{4} \]
    sumApply the sum rule.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \frac{d}{d x} \frac{3 x}{2} - \frac{3 \frac{d}{d x} \sin{\left(2 x + 2 \right)}}{4} \]
    constant-multiple constant-multipleFactor out the constant 3/4. Rewrite 3/2 as a constant multiplier.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = \frac{3 \frac{d}{d x} x}{2} - \frac{3 \frac{d}{d x} \sin{\left(2 x + 2 \right)}}{4} \]
    constant-multipleFactor out 3/2 from the first term.✓ Proved
  5. \[ = \frac{3}{2} - \frac{3 \frac{d}{d x} \sin{\left(2 x + 2 \right)}}{4} \]
    derivative simplifyDifferentiate x with respect to x. Simplify the first term.✓ Proved
  6. \[ = - \frac{3 \cos{\left(2 x + 2 \right)} \frac{d}{d x} \left(2 x + 2\right)}{4} + \frac{3}{2} \]
    trigApply the derivative rule for sine.✓ Proved
  7. \[ = - \frac{3 \cos{\left(2 x + 2 \right)} \frac{d}{d x} 2 x}{4} + \frac{3}{2} \]
    constantDifferentiate the constant 2.✓ Proved
  8. \[ = - \frac{3 \cos{\left(2 x + 2 \right)} \frac{d}{d x} x}{2} + \frac{3}{2} \]
    constant-multipleFactor out the constant 2.✓ Proved
  9. \[ = \frac{3}{2} - \frac{3 \cos{\left(2 x + 2 \right)}}{2} \]
    derivative simplifyDifferentiate x with respect to x. Multiply the constants (3/4 * 2 = 3/2).✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{3}{2} - \frac{3 \cos{\left(2 x + 2 \right)}}{2} \)

Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. A reviewer's objection to the explanation stands; see the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
7✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
8✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
9✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
10✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
11✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
12✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) — Step 9 incorrectly drops the constant term and applies the constant rule to 2*x+2. The derivative of 2*x+2 is 2, not the derivative of 2. This step applies more than one rule at once and mislabels the operation.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — Step 9 is mathematically incorrect; it claims to differentiate the constant 2, but the derivative of a constant is 0, not 1. The step incorrectly transforms Derivative(2*x + 2, x) into Derivative(2*x, x) by dropping the constant term without accounting for its zero derivative, and the label 'constant' is misapplied to this invalid operation.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-27 — Step 9 is mathematically incorrect; it claims to differentiate the constant 2, but the derivative of a constant is 0, not 1. The step incorrectly transforms Derivative(2*x + 2, x) into Derivative(2*x, x) by dropping the constant term without accounting for its zero derivative, and the label 'constant' is misapplied to this invalid operation.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-09-27 — Step 9 incorrectly drops the constant term and applies the constant rule to 2*x+2. The derivative of 2*x+2 is 2, not the derivative of 2. This step applies more than one rule at once and mislabels the operation.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-27 — Step 9 is mathematically incorrect. It claims to apply the 'constant' rule to differentiate the constant 2, but the derivative of a constant is 0, not 1. The step incorrectly transforms Derivative(2*x + 2, x) into Derivative(2*x, x) by dropping the +2 without accounting for its derivative being 0, or it implies the derivative of the constant term is 1, which is false.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-09-27 — Step 9 incorrectly applies the derivative: it claims to differentiate the constant 2, but the derivative of 2*x+2 is 2 (from 2*x) plus 0 from the constant. The step also uses an incorrect rule label (“constant”).

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-27 with SymPy 1.14.0.