Derivative of \( \displaystyle \left(2 x - 4\right) e^{x - 1} \)
Problem 2.1014 · medium
Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = 2 \left(x - 2\right) e^{x - 1} \).
- \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(2 x - 4\right) e^{x - 1} \]Start with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
- \[ = \left(2 x - 4\right) \frac{d}{d x} e^{x - 1} + 2 e^{x - 1} \frac{d}{d x} \left(x - 2\right) \]productApply the product rule.✓ Proved
- \[ = \left(2 x - 4\right) \frac{d}{d x} e^{x - 1} + 2 e^{x - 1} \]derivative constant-multipleDifferentiate the first part of the product. Simplify the first term.✓ Proved
- \[ = \left(2 x - 4\right) e^{x - 1} \frac{d}{d x} \left(x - 1\right) + 2 e^{x - 1} \]chainApply the chain rule to the exponential term.✓ Proved
- \[ = \left(2 x - 4\right) e^{x - 1} + 2 e^{x - 1} \]derivative constant-multipleDifferentiate the exponent. Simplify the last term.✓ Proved
- \[ = 2 \left(x - 1\right) e^{x - 1} \]algebra simplifyFactor out the common term 2*exp(x - 1). Simplify the expression inside the parentheses.✓ Proved
Answer \( 2 \left(x - 1\right) e^{x - 1} \)
✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | line 1 is the problem as stated |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 6 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 7 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 8 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 9 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| answer | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies the product rule, chain rule, and basic differentiation rules in a step-by-step manner. Each step changes only one aspect of the expression and uses appropriate labels from the fixed vocabulary.
Every verdict on record (4)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-27 — The solution correctly applies the product rule, chain rule, and basic differentiation rules in a step-by-step manner. Each step changes only one aspect of the expression and uses appropriate labels from the fixed vocabulary.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-27qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-27 — The solution correctly applies the product rule, chain rule, and basic differentiation rules in a logical sequence. Each step isolates a single operation, and the labels accurately reflect the rules applied.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-27
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-27 with SymPy 1.14.0.