Home›Calculus 1›Exponential and logarithmic equations›Problem 13.385

Exponential and logarithmic equations

Problem 13.385 · easy

Solve \( \displaystyle 2 e^{x} = 6 \) exactly.

Divide out the coefficient, then take ln of both sides.
Reviewed
\[ \left. 2 e^{x} - 6 \right|_{\substack{ x=\ln{\left(3 \right)} }} = 0 \]
x = log(3) satisfies the equation.✓ Proved

Answer \( x = \ln{\left(3 \right)} \)

✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 1 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. How we verify

The full receipt

Line	Status	Checked by	Detail
1	Reviewed	reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx	a sentence; read, not computed
2	✓ Proved	sympy 1.14.0	simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way	✓ Checked independently	sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0	Newton's method over [−20, 20] finds exactly the claimed real roots

Reviewers

gpt-oss:20b: pass
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the algebraic steps (isolating the exponential term and applying the natural logarithm) and verifies the result. The notation 'log' is standard for natural logarithm in this context.

Every verdict on record (6)

qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-19 — The solution correctly identifies the algebraic steps (isolating the exponential term and applying the natural logarithm) and verifies the result. The notation 'log' is standard for natural logarithm in this context.
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-19
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-18 — The solution correctly identifies the algebraic steps to isolate x and verifies the result. The use of 'log' for natural logarithm is standard in this context.
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-18
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-18 — The solution correctly identifies the algebraic steps (isolating the exponential term and applying the natural logarithm) and verifies the result. The logic is sound and the final answer is correct.
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-18

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/log_exp_equations, checked 2026-10-19 with SymPy 1.14.0.