∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›Inverse functions›Problem 13.32

Inverse functions

Problem 13.32 · easy

Find the inverse of \( \displaystyle f(x) = 2 - 4 x \).
  1. Write y = f(x) and solve for x. Subtract the constant and divide. Then rename y as x.
    Reviewed
  2. \[ \left. 2 - 4 x \right|_{\substack{ x=- \frac{x}{4} + 1 \cdot \frac{1}{2} }} = x \]
    f(f⁻¹(x)) = x, so this is the inverse.✓ Proved
  3. \[ \left. - \frac{x}{4} + 1 \cdot \frac{1}{2} \right|_{\substack{ x=\left. 2 - 4 x \right|_{\substack{ x=1 }} }} = 1 \]
    And f⁻¹(f(1)) = 1.✓ Proved
Answer \( f^{-1}(x) = \frac{1}{2} - \frac{x}{4} \)

✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Reviewedreviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlxa sentence; read, not computed
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0f then the answer, in floating point, returns the starting x

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the method for finding an inverse function and provides a valid candidate. The verification steps, while limited to specific points rather than a general proof, are sufficient to confirm the result in this context and do not teach false concepts.
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-17 — The solution correctly identifies the method for finding an inverse function and provides a valid candidate. The verification steps, while limited to specific points rather than a general proof, are sufficient to confirm the result in this context and do not teach false concepts.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-17
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-14 — The solution correctly identifies the method for finding an inverse function and provides a valid algebraic result. The verification steps, while specific, confirm the correctness of the derived inverse.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-14 — The solution correctly identifies the method for finding an inverse function and provides valid verification steps. The stated answer is correct.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/inverse_function, checked 2026-10-17 with SymPy 1.14.0.