Home›Calculus 1›Exponential and logarithmic equations›Problem 13.185

Exponential and logarithmic equations

Problem 13.185 · medium

Solve \( \displaystyle \ln{\left(x \right)} + \ln{\left(x - 2 \right)} = \ln{\left(15 \right)} \) exactly.

Co2bine the logs: ln(x(x − 2)) = ln 15, so x(x − 2) = 15, a quadratic. x = -3 is extraneous: it makes a logarithm's argument negative.
\[ \left. \ln{\left(x \right)} + \ln{\left(x - 2 \right)} - \ln{\left(15 \right)} \right|_{\substack{ x=5 }} = 0 \]
x = 5 satisfies the equation.✓ Proved

Answer \( x = 5 \)

Lines: 1 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. How we verify

The full receipt

Line	Status	Checked by	Detail
1	Not checked	—	a sentence; read, not computed
2	✓ Proved	sympy 1.14.0	simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way	✓ Checked independently	sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0	Newton's method over [−20, 20] finds exactly the claimed real roots

Reviewers

gpt-oss:20b: pass
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) — [domain objection, downgraded to style] The solution fails to explicitly determine the valid domain (x > 2) before solving, which is necessary to rigorously justify why x = -3 is extraneous. Simply stating it makes an argument negative is insufficient without establishing that the original equation requires both arguments to be positive.

Every verdict on record (6)

qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) 2026-10-18 — [domain objection, downgraded to style] The solution fails to explicitly determine the valid domain (x > 2) before solving, which is necessary to rigorously justify why x = -3 is extraneous. Simply stating it makes an argument negative is insufficient without establishing that the original equation requires both arguments to be positive.
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-18
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-16 — The solution correctly applies logarithm properties, solves the resulting quadratic, and properly identifies and discards the extraneous root based on the domain of the logarithmic function.
gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-10-16 — [domain objection, downgraded to style] The solution skips the domain analysis (x>2) and the explicit solving of the quadratic, merely stating that x=−3 is extraneous without justification. A student could be misled into thinking the domain check is unnecessary or that the quadratic was solved correctly without showing the steps.
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) 2026-10-14 — [domain objection, downgraded to style] The solution fails to explicitly state or check the domain constraints (x > 2) required for the logarithms to be defined. While it correctly identifies x = -3 as extraneous, it does not explain why x = 5 is the only valid solution among the roots of the quadratic, nor does it verify that x = 5 satisfies the domain condition.
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/log_exp_equations, checked 2026-10-18 with SymPy 1.14.0.