Exponential and logarithmic equations
Problem 13.183 · easy
Solve \( \displaystyle 3 e^{3 x} = 21 \) exactly.
- Divide out the coefficient, then take ln of both sides.Reviewed
- \[ \left. 3 e^{3 x} - 21 \right|_{\substack{ x=\frac{\ln{\left(7 \right)}}{3} }} = 0 \]x = log(7)/3 satisfies the equation.✓ Proved
Answer \( x = \frac{\ln{\left(7 \right)}}{3} \)
Lines: 1 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | Newton's method over [−20, 20] finds exactly the claimed real roots |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the algebraic steps required to isolate x and provides the exact solution. The verification step confirms the result.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-18 — The solution correctly identifies the algebraic steps required to isolate x and provides the exact solution. The verification step confirms the result.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-18qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-16 — The solution only verifies that the proposed answer is a root, but it does not demonstrate that it is the unique solution. Solving an equation requires showing equivalence or uniqueness, not just checking a candidate.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-16qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-14 — The solution correctly identifies the algebraic steps (isolating the exponential term and applying the natural logarithm) and verifies the result. The logic is sound and complete for an exact solution.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/log_exp_equations, checked 2026-10-18 with SymPy 1.14.0.