∫Calc Practice

Exponential and logarithmic equations

Problem 13.183 · easy

Solve \( \displaystyle 3 e^{3 x} = 21 \) exactly.
  1. Divide out the coefficient, then take ln of both sides.
    Reviewed
  2. \[ \left. 3 e^{3 x} - 21 \right|_{\substack{ x=\frac{\ln{\left(7 \right)}}{3} }} = 0 \]
    x = log(7)/3 satisfies the equation.✓ Proved
Answer \( x = \frac{\ln{\left(7 \right)}}{3} \)

Lines: 1 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Reviewedreviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlxa sentence; read, not computed
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0Newton's method over [−20, 20] finds exactly the claimed real roots

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the algebraic steps required to isolate x and provides the exact solution. The verification step confirms the result.
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-18 — The solution correctly identifies the algebraic steps required to isolate x and provides the exact solution. The verification step confirms the result.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-18
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-16 — The solution only verifies that the proposed answer is a root, but it does not demonstrate that it is the unique solution. Solving an equation requires showing equivalence or uniqueness, not just checking a candidate.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-16
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-14 — The solution correctly identifies the algebraic steps (isolating the exponential term and applying the natural logarithm) and verifies the result. The logic is sound and complete for an exact solution.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/log_exp_equations, checked 2026-10-18 with SymPy 1.14.0.