∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›Inverse functions›Problem 13.164

Inverse functions

Problem 13.164 · medium

Find the inverse of \( \displaystyle f(x) = \ln{\left(x - 4 \right)} + 1 \).
  1. Write y = f(x) and solve for x. Isolate the log, then exponentiate. Then rename y as x.
    Reviewed
  2. \[ \left. \ln{\left(x - 4 \right)} + 1 \right|_{\substack{ x=e^{x - 1} + 4 }} = x \]
    f(f⁻¹(x)) = x, so this is the inverse.✓ Proved
  3. \[ \left. e^{x - 1} + 4 \right|_{\substack{ x=\left. \ln{\left(x - 4 \right)} + 1 \right|_{\substack{ x=7 }} }} = 7 \]
    And f⁻¹(f(7)) = 7.✓ Proved
Answer \( f^{-1}(x) = e^{x - 1} + 4 \)

Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Reviewedreviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlxa sentence; read, not computed
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0f then the answer, in floating point, returns the starting x

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the method for finding the inverse and provides valid verification steps. The logic is sound.
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-18 — The solution correctly identifies the method for finding the inverse and provides valid verification steps. The logic is sound.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-18
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (misleading) 2026-10-16 — The solution skips the derivation entirely, jumping straight to verification. It fails to demonstrate the actual process of finding the inverse (solving y = ln(x-4) + 1 for x), which is the core task of the problem.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-16
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-14 — The solution correctly describes the standard algebraic method for finding the inverse of a logarithmic function. The verification steps confirm the result is correct.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/inverse_function, checked 2026-10-18 with SymPy 1.14.0.