∫Calc Practice

Flux across a plane curve

Problem 12.404 · medium

Find the flux of \( \displaystyle \mathbf F = \left\langle x^{2}, y \right\rangle \) across the circle of radius 2, counterclockwise (outward normal).
  1. With r(t) = <2*cos(t), 2*sin(t)>, the normal n ds = ⟨y′, −x′⟩ dt (to the right of the direction of travel), so flux = ∫ (P y′ − Q x′) dt.
  2. \[ \frac{d}{d t} 2 \sin{\left(t \right)} \left. x^{2} \right|_{\substack{ x=2 \cos{\left(t \right)}\\ y=2 \sin{\left(t \right)} }} - \frac{d}{d t} 2 \cos{\left(t \right)} \left. y \right|_{\substack{ x=2 \cos{\left(t \right)}\\ y=2 \sin{\left(t \right)} }} = 4 \sin^{2}{\left(t \right)} + 8 \cos^{3}{\left(t \right)} \]
    P y′ − Q x′.✓ Proved
  3. \[ \int\limits_{0}^{2 \pi} \left(4 \sin^{2}{\left(t \right)} + 8 \cos^{3}{\left(t \right)}\right)\, dt = 4 \pi \]
    Integrate.✓ Proved
Answer \( 4 \pi \)

Lines: 2 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0F · n summed over a 20,000-segment polyline

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — The normal vector formula used, <y', -x'>, points inward for a counterclockwise parametrization, whereas the problem specifies the outward normal. This results in the wrong sign for the flux.
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-18 — The normal vector formula used, <y', -x'>, points inward for a counterclockwise parametrization, whereas the problem specifies the outward normal. This results in the wrong sign for the flux.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-18
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-15 — The normal vector formula used, <y', -x'>, corresponds to the inward normal for a counterclockwise traversal, whereas the problem specifies the outward normal. The correct outward normal form is <-y', x'>, which would yield a flux of -4\pi.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-15
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-14 — The normal vector formula used, <y', -x'>, points inward for a counterclockwise parametrization, whereas the problem requires the outward normal. The correct outward normal form is <-y', x'>, which would change the sign of the flux integral.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/flux_plane, checked 2026-10-18 with SymPy 1.14.0.