Flux across a plane curve
Problem 12.400 · medium
Find the flux of \( \displaystyle \mathbf F = \left\langle x^{2}, y \right\rangle \) across the circle of radius 3, counterclockwise (outward normal).
- With r(t) = <3*cos(t), 3*sin(t)>, the normal n ds = ⟨y′, −x′⟩ dt (to the right of the direction of travel), so flux = ∫ (P y′ − Q x′) dt.
- \[ \frac{d}{d t} 3 \sin{\left(t \right)} \left. x^{2} \right|_{\substack{ x=3 \cos{\left(t \right)}\\ y=3 \sin{\left(t \right)} }} - \frac{d}{d t} 3 \cos{\left(t \right)} \left. y \right|_{\substack{ x=3 \cos{\left(t \right)}\\ y=3 \sin{\left(t \right)} }} = 9 \sin^{2}{\left(t \right)} + 27 \cos^{3}{\left(t \right)} \]P y′ − Q x′.✓ Proved
- \[ \int\limits_{0}^{2 \pi} \left(9 \sin^{2}{\left(t \right)} + 27 \cos^{3}{\left(t \right)}\right)\, dt = 9 \pi \]Integrate.✓ Proved
Answer \( 9 \pi \)
Lines: 2 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Not checked | — | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | F · n summed over a 20,000-segment polyline |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: fail (misleading) — The sentence claims the normal vector is to the right of the direction of travel, which is incorrect for a counter‑clockwise orientation; the outward normal should point to the left. This misstatement could mislead a student about the correct orientation for flux integrals.qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — The normal vector formula used, <y', -x'>, points inward for a counterclockwise parametrization, whereas the problem requires the outward normal. The correct outward normal vector is <-y', x'>, which would change the sign of the flux integral.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-18 — The normal vector formula used, <y', -x'>, points inward for a counterclockwise parametrization, whereas the problem requires the outward normal. The correct outward normal vector is <-y', x'>, which would change the sign of the flux integral.gpt-oss:20b: fail (misleading) 2026-10-18 — The sentence claims the normal vector is to the right of the direction of travel, which is incorrect for a counter‑clockwise orientation; the outward normal should point to the left. This misstatement could mislead a student about the correct orientation for flux integrals.qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-15 — The normal vector formula used, <y', -x'>, points inward for a counterclockwise parametrization, but the problem specifies an outward normal. The correct outward normal is <-y', x'>, which would change the sign of the flux integral.gpt-oss:20b: inconclusive 2026-10-15 — reviewer response could not be parsed: {"verdict":"fail","severity":"error","notes":"The normal vector used is wrong: for a counter‑clockwise traversal the outward normal points to the left of the direction of travel, not to the right. Conqwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-14 — The normal vector formula used, <y', -x'>, points inward for a counterclockwise parametrization, whereas the problem specifies the outward normal. The correct outward normal is <-y', x'>, which would change the sign of the flux integral.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/flux_plane, checked 2026-10-18 with SymPy 1.14.0.