∫Calc Practice

Line integrals of scalar functions

Problem 12.316 · medium

Evaluate \( \displaystyle \int_C z \, ds \), where \( \displaystyle C \) is the quarter circle of radius 3 in the xy-plane, from (3, 0, 0) to (0, 3, 0).
  1. Parametrize: r(t) = <3*cos(t), 3*sin(t), 0>, 0 ≤ t ≤ pi/2; ds = ‖r′(t)‖ dt.
    Reviewed
  2. \[ \sqrt{\left(\frac{d}{d t} 0\right)^{2} + \left(\frac{d}{d t} 3 \sin{\left(t \right)}\right)^{2} + \left(\frac{d}{d t} 3 \cos{\left(t \right)}\right)^{2}} = 3 \]
    ‖r′(t)‖.✓ Proved
  3. \[ \int\limits_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \left. z \right|_{\substack{ x=3 \cos{\left(t \right)}\\ y=3 \sin{\left(t \right)}\\ z=0 }} \cdot 3\, dt = 0 \]
    ∫ f(r(t)) ‖r′(t)‖ dt.✓ Proved
Answer \( 0 \)

✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Reviewedreviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlxa sentence; read, not computed
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0f at each segment's midpoint times its length, over a 20,000-segment polyline

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The parametrization correctly models the quarter circle in the xy-plane. Since z=0 on the curve, the integrand is identically zero, leading to the correct result of 0.
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-17 — The parametrization correctly models the quarter circle in the xy-plane. Since z=0 on the curve, the integrand is identically zero, leading to the correct result of 0.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-17
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-15 — The parametrization correctly describes the quarter circle in the xy-plane, where z=0. Consequently, the integrand z vanishes, making the integral 0. The steps are logically sound and algebraically correct.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-15
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-14
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/line_integral_scalar, checked 2026-10-17 with SymPy 1.14.0.