∫Calc Practice

The divergence theorem

Problem 12.267 · medium

Use the divergence theorem to find the outward flux of \( \displaystyle \mathbf F = \left(x^{2}\right)\mathbf i + \left(- 2 y\right)\mathbf j + \left(0\right)\mathbf k \) across the sphere \( \displaystyle x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1 \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d z} 0 + \frac{d}{d x} x^{2} + \frac{d}{d y} \left(- 2 y\right) = 2 x - 2 \]
    div F.✓ Proved
  2. Flux out of a closed surface = ∭ div F dV over the solid inside it (in spherical coordinates).
    Reviewed
  3. \[ \int\limits_{0}^{2 \pi}\int\limits_{0}^{\pi}\int\limits_{0}^{1} \rho^{2} \left(2 \rho \sin{\left(\phi \right)} \cos{\left(\theta \right)} - 2\right) \sin{\left(\phi \right)}\, d\rho\, d\phi\, d\theta = - \frac{8 \pi}{3} \]
    The triple integral.✓ Proved
Answer \( - \frac{8 \pi}{3} \)

✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
2Reviewedreviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlxa sentence; read, not computed
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0the surface integral F·n dS over the sphere, computed directly

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies the Divergence Theorem, computes the divergence accurately, and sets up the triple integral in spherical coordinates with correct bounds and integrand.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-09
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-09 — The solution correctly applies the Divergence Theorem, computes the divergence accurately, and sets up the triple integral in spherical coordinates with correct bounds and integrand.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-09
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-09

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/divergence_theorem, checked 2026-10-09 with SymPy 1.14.0.