The divergence theorem
Problem 12.234 · easy
Use the divergence theorem to find the outward flux of \( \displaystyle \mathbf F = \left(x y\right)\mathbf i + \left(y^{2}\right)\mathbf j + \left(x y\right)\mathbf k \) across the sphere \( \displaystyle x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 4 \).
- \[ \frac{d}{d y} y^{2} + \frac{\partial}{\partial x} x y + \frac{\partial}{\partial z} x y = 3 y \]div F.✓ Proved
- Flux out of a closed surface = ∭ div F dV over the solid inside it (in spherical coordinates).Reviewed
- \[ \int\limits_{0}^{2 \pi}\int\limits_{0}^{\pi}\int\limits_{0}^{2} 3 \rho^{3} \sin^{2}{\left(\phi \right)} \sin{\left(\theta \right)}\, d\rho\, d\phi\, d\theta = 0 \]The triple integral.✓ Proved
Answer \( 0 \)
Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 2 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | the surface integral F·n dS over the sphere, computed directly |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies the Divergence Theorem, computes the divergence, sets up the triple integral in spherical coordinates with correct bounds and Jacobian, and obtains the correct result of 0 due to symmetry.
Every verdict on record (4)
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-07qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-07 — The solution correctly applies the Divergence Theorem, computes the divergence, sets up the triple integral in spherical coordinates with correct bounds and Jacobian, and obtains the correct result of 0 due to symmetry.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-07qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-07 — The divergence calculation is incorrect; div F = y + 2y + 0 = 3y, not 3y derived from the wrong partials (specifically, the z-component derivative is 0, not y). Furthermore, the integrand in spherical coordinates is wrong: 3y = 3*rho*sin(phi)*sin(theta), but the solution uses 3*rho^3*sin(phi)^2*sin(theta). Although the final answer 0 is correct by symmetry, the intermediate steps contain significant algebraic and conversion errors.
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/divergence_theorem, checked 2026-10-07 with SymPy 1.14.0.