∫Calc Practice

The divergence theorem

Problem 12.205 · easy

Use the divergence theorem to find the outward flux of \( \displaystyle \mathbf F = \left(y z\right)\mathbf i + \left(y z\right)\mathbf j + \left(z^{2}\right)\mathbf k \) across the sphere \( \displaystyle x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 4 \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d z} z^{2} + \frac{\partial}{\partial x} y z + \frac{\partial}{\partial y} y z = 3 z \]
    div F.✓ Proved
  2. Flux out of a closed surface = ∭ div F dV over the solid inside it (in spherical coordinates).
  3. \[ \int\limits_{0}^{2 \pi}\int\limits_{0}^{\pi}\int\limits_{0}^{2} 3 \rho^{3} \sin{\left(\phi \right)} \cos{\left(\phi \right)}\, d\rho\, d\phi\, d\theta = 0 \]
    The triple integral.✓ Proved
Answer \( 0 \)

Lines: 2 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
2Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0the surface integral F·n dS over the sphere, computed directly

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — The divergence calculation in step 1 is incorrect; div F is z + 1, not 3z. Consequently, the integral in step 3 is set up with the wrong integrand, leading to an incorrect result of 0 instead of 8π.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-06
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-06 — The divergence calculation in step 1 is incorrect; div F is z + 1, not 3z. Consequently, the integral in step 3 is set up with the wrong integrand, leading to an incorrect result of 0 instead of 8π.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-06
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-06 — The divergence calculation in step 1 is incorrect; div F is 2z, not 3z. Additionally, step 3 incorrectly converts z to rho*cos(phi) but fails to square it (using rho instead of rho^2), leading to the wrong integrand.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/divergence_theorem, checked 2026-10-06 with SymPy 1.14.0.