The divergence theorem
Problem 12.200 · easy
Use the divergence theorem to find the outward flux of \( \displaystyle \mathbf F = \left(x y\right)\mathbf i + \left(y^{2}\right)\mathbf j + \left(z\right)\mathbf k \) across the surface of the box \( \displaystyle [0, 3] \times [0, 3] \times [0, 3] \).
- \[ \frac{d}{d y} y^{2} + \frac{d}{d z} z + \frac{\partial}{\partial x} x y = 3 y + 1 \]div F.✓ Proved
- Flux out of a closed surface = ∭ div F dV over the solid inside it.Reviewed
- \[ \int\limits_{0}^{3}\int\limits_{0}^{3}\int\limits_{0}^{3} \left(3 y + 1\right)\, dx\, dy\, dz = \frac{297}{2} \]The triple integral.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{297}{2} \)
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 2 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | the flux through the six faces of the box, computed directly |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies the Divergence Theorem, computes the divergence accurately, and evaluates the triple integral over the specified box.
Every verdict on record (4)
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-06qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-06 — The solution correctly applies the Divergence Theorem, computes the divergence accurately, and evaluates the triple integral over the specified box.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-06qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-06 — The solution correctly applies the divergence theorem. The divergence is calculated correctly, and the triple integral over the specified box yields the correct result.
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/divergence_theorem, checked 2026-10-06 with SymPy 1.14.0.