∫Calc Practice

Riemann sums for double integrals

Problem 11.554 · medium

Estimate \( \displaystyle \iint_R 8 x y + 4 x + 2 y \, dA \) over \( \displaystyle R = [0, 2] \times [0, 1] \) with a Riemann sum, \( \displaystyle m = 4 \) subintervals in \( \displaystyle x \) and \( \displaystyle n = 2 \) in \( \displaystyle y \), sampling at the midpoint points.
  1. \[ 1 \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot 2 \cdot \frac{1}{4} = \frac{1}{4} \]
    ΔA = Δx Δy.✓ Proved
  2. The sample points: (1/4, 1/4), (1/4, 3/4), (3/4, 1/4), (3/4, 3/4), (5/4, 1/4), (5/4, 3/4), (7/4, 1/4), (7/4, 3/4).
    Reviewed
  3. \[ 1 \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot 1 \cdot \frac{1}{2} \left(2 + 4 + 5 + 8 + 9 + 11 + 14 + 19\right) = 18 \]
    ΔA times the sum of f at the sample points.✓ Proved
  4. \[ \int\limits_{0}^{1}\int\limits_{0}^{2} \left(8 x y + 4 x + 2 y\right)\, dx\, dy = 18 \]
    For comparison, the exact value is 18.✓ Proved
Answer \( 18 \)

Lines: 3 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
2Reviewedreviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlxa sentence; read, not computed
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0the sum recomputed in exact fractions

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the subregion area, the midpoint sample points, and the function evaluations. The final sum matches the exact integral value, which is consistent for this quadratic function.
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-27 — The solution correctly identifies the subregion area, the midpoint sample points, and the function evaluations. The final sum matches the exact integral value, which is consistent for this quadratic function.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-27
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-26 — The solution correctly identifies the subinterval widths, midpoints, and function evaluations. The final sum is correct and matches the exact integral.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-26
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-26 — reviewer returned a non-object
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-26

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/double_riemann, checked 2026-10-27 with SymPy 1.14.0.