Home›Calculus 3›Riemann sums for double integrals›Problem 11.456

Riemann sums for double integrals

Problem 11.456 · medium

Estimate \( \displaystyle \iint_R 8 x y + 4 x + 2 y \, dA \) over \( \displaystyle R = [0, 2] \times [0, 2] \) with a Riemann sum, \( \displaystyle m = 4 \) subintervals in \( \displaystyle x \) and \( \displaystyle n = 2 \) in \( \displaystyle y \), sampling at the midpoint points.

\[ 2 \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot 2 \cdot \frac{1}{4} = \frac{1}{2} \]
ΔA = Δx Δy.✓ Proved
The sample points: (1/4, 1/2), (1/4, 3/2), (3/4, 1/2), (3/4, 3/2), (5/4, 1/2), (5/4, 3/2), (7/4, 1/2), (7/4, 3/2).
\[ 1 \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot 1 \left(3 + 7 + 7 + 11 + 15 + 15 + 23 + 31\right) = 56 \]
ΔA times the sum of f at the sample points.✓ Proved
\[ \int\limits_{0}^{2}\int\limits_{0}^{2} \left(8 x y + 4 x + 2 y\right)\, dx\, dy = 56 \]
For comparison, the exact value is 56.✓ Proved

Answer \( 56 \)

Lines: 3 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt

Line	Status	Checked by	Detail
1	✓ Proved	sympy 1.14.0	simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
2	Not checked	—	a sentence; read, not computed
3	✓ Proved	sympy 1.14.0	simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
4	✓ Proved	sympy 1.14.0	simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way	✓ Checked independently	sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0	the sum recomputed in exact fractions

Reviewers

gpt-oss:20b: pass
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive — reviewer returned a non-object

Every verdict on record (6)

qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-18 — reviewer returned a non-object
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-18
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-16 — reviewer returned a non-object
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-16
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-15 — reviewer returned a non-object
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-15

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/double_riemann, checked 2026-10-18 with SymPy 1.14.0.