∫Calc Practice

Double integrals in polar coordinates

Problem 11.31 · medium

Evaluate \( \displaystyle \iint_D e^{- x^{2} - y^{2}} \, dA \) over the disk \( \displaystyle x^2 + y^2 \le 1 \) using polar coordinates.
  1. In polar coordinates the disk is 0 ≤ r ≤ R, 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π, and dA = r dr dθ.
  2. \[ e^{- r^{2} \sin^{2}{\left(\theta \right)} - r^{2} \cos^{2}{\left(\theta \right)}} = e^{- r^{2}} \]
    The integrand in r and θ.✓ Proved
  3. \[ \int\limits_{0}^{2 \pi}\int\limits_{0}^{1} r e^{- r^{2}}\, dr\, d\theta = - \frac{\pi}{e} + \pi \]
    Integrate, remembering the extra r.✓ Proved
Answer \( - \frac{\pi}{e} + \pi \)

Lines: 2 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0the integral done in x and y, numerically, without polar coordinates, agrees

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — The solution incorrectly states the radial bound as R instead of 1 in the first sentence, although the subsequent integration correctly uses 1. This inconsistency between the setup description and the calculation is an error.
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-28 — The solution incorrectly states the radial bound as R instead of 1 in the first sentence, although the subsequent integration correctly uses 1. This inconsistency between the setup description and the calculation is an error.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-28
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-27 — The solution correctly identifies the polar coordinate transformation, bounds, and Jacobian. The integration steps are algebraically correct and lead to the right answer.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-27
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-26 — The solution correctly sets up the polar coordinates, transforms the integrand, and evaluates the integral.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-26

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/double_integral_polar, checked 2026-09-28 with SymPy 1.14.0.