Limits of functions of two variables
Problem 10.781 · easy
Find \( \displaystyle \lim_{(x,y)\to(3,3)} \frac{x^{2} + y}{x y + 1} \), or show it does not exist.
- The function is continuous at the point (no division by zero there), so substitute.Reviewed
- \[ \left. \frac{x^{2} + y}{x y + 1} \right|_{\substack{ x=3\\ y=3 }} = \frac{6}{5} \]Direct substitution.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{6}{5} \)
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 1 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | values along ten paths into the point (lines and parabolas) all approach it |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies that the function is continuous at the point (3,3) because the denominator is non-zero, and correctly applies direct substitution.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-11-02 — The solution correctly identifies that the function is continuous at the point (3,3) because the denominator is non-zero, and correctly applies direct substitution.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-11-02qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-11-01 — The solution correctly identifies that the function is continuous at the point (3,3) because the denominator is non-zero, justifying direct substitution.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-11-01qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-11-01 — The solution correctly identifies that the function is continuous at the point (3,3) because the denominator is non-zero, and correctly applies direct substitution to find the limit.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-11-01
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/multivariable_limits, checked 2026-11-02 with SymPy 1.14.0.