Home›Calculus 3›The multivariable chain rule›Problem 10.347

The multivariable chain rule

Problem 10.347 · easy

Let \( \displaystyle z = \ln{\left(x^{2} + y^{2} + 1 \right)} \) with \( \displaystyle x = s t \), \( \displaystyle y = s + t \). Find \( \displaystyle \frac{\partial z}{\partial s} \) at \( \displaystyle s = 2 \), \( \displaystyle t = 0 \).

\[ \left[\begin{matrix}\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \ln{\left(x^{2} + y^{2} + 1 \right)}\\\frac{\partial}{\partial y} \ln{\left(x^{2} + y^{2} + 1 \right)}\end{matrix}\right] = \left[\begin{matrix}\frac{2 x}{x^{2} + y^{2} + 1}\\\frac{2 y}{x^{2} + y^{2} + 1}\end{matrix}\right] \]
∂z/∂x and ∂z/∂y.✓ Proved
∂z/∂s = (∂z/∂x)(∂x/∂s) + (∂z/∂y)(∂y/∂s).
Reviewed
\[ \frac{4}{5} \]
Substitute.✓ Proved

Answer \( \frac{4}{5} \)

✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt

Line	Status	Checked by	Detail
1	✓ Proved	sympy 1.14.0	simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
2	Reviewed	reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx	a sentence; read, not computed
3	✓ Proved	sympy 1.14.0	simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way	✓ Checked independently	sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0	substituted first, then differenced numerically

Reviewers

gpt-oss:20b: pass
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies the multivariable chain rule and the final substitution yields the correct result.

Every verdict on record (4)

qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-04 — The solution correctly applies the multivariable chain rule and the final substitution yields the correct result.
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-04
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-04 — The solution correctly applies the chain rule and the final numerical result is correct. Although the intermediate substitution steps are omitted, the logic is sound and the conclusion follows.
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-04

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/multivariable_chain_rule, checked 2026-10-04 with SymPy 1.14.0.