∫Calc Practice

Implicit differentiation with partial derivatives

Problem 10.311 · easy

Use partial derivatives to find \( \displaystyle \frac{dy}{dx} \) at \( \displaystyle (-1, 2) \) for the curve \( \displaystyle x^{2} y + y^{3} = 10 \).
  1. \[ \left[\begin{matrix}\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left(x^{2} y + y^{3}\right)\\\frac{\partial}{\partial y} \left(x^{2} y + y^{3}\right)\end{matrix}\right] = \left[\begin{matrix}2 x y\\x^{2} + 3 y^{2}\end{matrix}\right] \]
    F_x and F_y.✓ Proved
  2. \[ \frac{4}{13} \]
    dy/dx = −F_x/F_y at the point.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{4}{13} \)

Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0solved the equation numerically near the point and differenced

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — The solution fails to explicitly evaluate the partial derivatives at the point (-1, 2) to justify the numerator and denominator. While the final arithmetic is correct, the step from the general symbolic derivatives to the specific numerical value is missing, making the logic incomplete.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-04 — The solution fails to explicitly evaluate the partial derivatives at the point (-1, 2) to justify the numerator and denominator. While the final arithmetic is correct, the step from the general symbolic derivatives to the specific numerical value is missing, making the logic incomplete.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-04
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-04 — The solution fails to explicitly state the formula for implicit differentiation, dy/dx = -F_x/F_y, which is required to justify the final step. It also skips the evaluation of the partial derivatives at the point (-1, 2), making the transition from the symbolic derivatives to the numerical answer unjustified.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-04

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/implicit_partials, checked 2026-10-04 with SymPy 1.14.0.