Continuity and types of discontinuity
Problem 1.754 · hard
Find every point where \( \displaystyle f(x) = \frac{x^{2} + 4 x + 3}{x^{2} + 3 x + 2} \) is discontinuous, and classify each discontinuity as removable, a jump, or infinite.
- A rational function is continuous wherever its denominator is not zero, so only the zeros of the denominator can be discontinuities.Reviewed
- \[ x^{2} + 3 x + 2 = \left(x + 1\right) \left(x + 2\right) \]Factor the denominator.✓ Proved
- \[ \frac{x^{2} + 4 x + 3}{x^{2} + 3 x + 2} = \frac{x + 3}{x + 2} \]The factor (x + 1) cancels.✓ Proved
- \[ \lim_{x \to -1^+}\left(\frac{x^{2} + 4 x + 3}{x^{2} + 3 x + 2}\right) = 2 \]At x = -1 the limit exists, but f(-1) is undefined: a removable discontinuity.✓ Proved
- \[ \left. x + 3 \right|_{\substack{ x=-2 }} = 1 \]At x = -2 the numerator is not 0 while the denominator is, so |f(x)| grows without bound: an infinite discontinuity.✓ Proved
Answer \( \text{removable at } x = -1;\ \text{infinite at } x = -2 \)
Lines: 4 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | zeros of the denominator found by solve, each probed at ±1e-9: {-2: 'infinite', -1: 'removable'} |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-25gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-25qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-24 — Line 4 only computes the right-hand limit, but for a removable discontinuity, the two-sided limit must exist (left and right limits must be equal). While true in this case, the reasoning is incomplete and technically incorrect as stated. Line 5 uses substitution on the simplified function to determine the numerator's value, which is valid, but the phrasing 'Subs... = 1' is an algebraic fact, not a limit evaluation, making the logical jump to 'infinite discontinuity' slightly abrupt without explicitly stating the limit of the simplified form is non-zero.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-24qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-24 — The solution correctly identifies the discontinuities and classifies them based on the behavior of the simplified function and limits.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-24
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/continuity_classify, checked 2026-10-25 with SymPy 1.14.0.