∫Calc Practice

Limit of \( \displaystyle \frac{4 x + 1}{4 x^{2} + 3} \) as \( x \to \infty \)

Problem 1.70 · medium

Evaluate \( \displaystyle \lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{4 x + 1}{4 x^{2} + 3} \).
  1. \[ \lim_{x \to \infty}\left(\frac{4 x + 1}{4 x^{2} + 3}\right) \]
    limitStart with the original limit expression.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = \lim_{x \to \infty}\left(\frac{\frac{4}{x} + \frac{1}{x^{2}}}{4 + \frac{3}{x^{2}}}\right) \]
    algebra simplifyDivide the numerator and denominator by the highest power of x in the denominator, which is x**2. Simplify the terms inside the limit.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \lim_{x \to \infty}\left(\frac{4}{x}\right) \left(\lim_{x \to \infty}\left(4 + \frac{3}{x^{2}}\right)\right)^{-1} \]
    limit-lawApply the quotient rule for limits.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = 0 \]
    limit simplifyEvaluate the limits of the individual components as x approaches infinity. Final evaluation of the fraction.✓ Proved
Answer \( 0 \)

Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. A reviewer's objection to the explanation stands; see the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*x**2 + 3 = 0
undefined where 4 + 3/x**2 = 0
undefined where x = 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4 + 3/x**2 = 0
undefined where x = 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4 + 3/x**2 = 0
undefined where x = 0
undefined where Limit(4 + 3/x**2, x, oo, dir='-') = 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where Limit(4 + 3/x**2, x, oo, dir='-') = 0
undefined where x = 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy took the limit from both sides and got the stated value

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) — Step 4 incorrectly drops the 1/x**2 term from the numerator when applying the limit-law. The numerator should be Limit(4/x + 1/x**2, x, oo), not just Limit(4/x, x, oo).
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — Step 4 incorrectly applies the quotient rule for limits by splitting the numerator into a single term `Limit(4/x, x, oo)` instead of the full numerator `Limit(4/x + 1/x**2, x, oo)`. This is a mathematical error in the application of the limit law.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-03 — Step 4 incorrectly applies the quotient rule for limits by splitting the numerator into a single term `Limit(4/x, x, oo)` instead of the full numerator `Limit(4/x + 1/x**2, x, oo)`. This is a mathematical error in the application of the limit law.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-10-03 — Step 4 incorrectly drops the 1/x**2 term from the numerator when applying the limit-law. The numerator should be Limit(4/x + 1/x**2, x, oo), not just Limit(4/x, x, oo).
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-30 — Step 4 incorrectly applies the quotient rule for limits by splitting the numerator into two separate limit terms (Limit(4/x) / Limit(4 + 3/x**2)) instead of keeping the numerator as a single limit expression (Limit(4/x + 1/x**2)). This is a logical error in the application of limit laws.
  • gpt-oss:20b: inconclusive 2026-09-30 — reviewer response could not be parsed: {"verdict":"fail","severity":"error","notes":"Step 4 incorrectly applies the limit-law to only the first term of the numerator, dropping the \(1/x^2\) term. The correct application would keep the enti

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-03 with SymPy 1.14.0.