∫Calc Practice

Making a piecewise function continuous

Problem 1.550 · medium

Find the value of \( \displaystyle k \) that makes \( \displaystyle f(x) = \begin{cases} k + 3 x^{2} & x < -1 \\ 3 x - 4 & x \ge -1 \end{cases} \) continuous for all \( \displaystyle x \).
  1. Each piece is a polynomial, so f is continuous everywhere except possibly at x = -1. There the left-hand limit, the right-hand limit and f(c) must agree.
  2. \[ \lim_{x \to -1^-}\left(k + 3 x^{2}\right) = k + 3 \]
    The left-hand limit, in terms of k.✓ Proved
  3. \[ \lim_{x \to -1^+}\left(3 x - 4\right) = -7 \]
    The right-hand limit, which is also f(c).✓ Proved
  4. \[ -7 \]
    Setting them equal gives k = -10.✓ Proved
Answer \( k = -10 \)

Lines: 3 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0with that k the two pieces agree at c ± 1e-10

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — Step 4 claims that setting the limits equal gives k = -10, but the equation shown is -7 = -7, which is a tautology and does not involve k. The correct equation should be k + 3 = -7.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-11 — Step 4 claims that setting the limits equal gives k = -10, but the equation shown is -7 = -7, which is a tautology and does not involve k. The correct equation should be k + 3 = -7.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-11
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-10-11 — The solution incorrectly sets the equality of limits as "-7 = -7" instead of "k + 3 = -7", thus failing to correctly solve for k.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-11 — Step 4 claims that setting the limits equal yields k = -10, but the equation shown is -7 = -7, which is a tautology and does not involve k. The correct equation should be k + 3 = -7.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/continuity_parameter, checked 2026-10-11 with SymPy 1.14.0.