∫Calc Practice

Limit of \( \displaystyle \frac{3 \left(2 x - 1\right)^{2} + 1}{\left(2 x - 1\right)^{2} - 4} \) as \( x \to \infty \)

Problem 1.42 · hard

Evaluate \( \displaystyle \lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{3 \left(2 x - 1\right)^{2} + 1}{\left(2 x - 1\right)^{2} - 4} \).
  1. \[ \lim_{x \to \infty}\left(\frac{3 \left(2 x - 1\right)^{2} + 1}{\left(2 x - 1\right)^{2} - 4}\right) \]
    limitEvaluate the limit of the given function as x approaches infinity.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = \lim_{x \to \infty}\left(\frac{12 x^{2} - 12 x + 4}{4 x^{2} - 4 x - 3}\right) \]
    algebra simplifyExpand the squared binomials. Distribute the 3 and combine constant terms.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \lim_{x \to \infty}\left(\frac{12 x^{2}}{4 x^{2} - 4 x - 3} - \frac{12 x}{4 x^{2} - 4 x - 3} + \frac{4}{4 x^{2} - 4 x - 3}\right) \]
    limit-lawSplit the fraction into three separate parts.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = - \lim_{x \to \infty}\left(\frac{12 x}{4 x^{2} - 4 x - 3}\right) + \lim_{x \to \infty}\left(\frac{12 x^{2}}{4 x^{2} - 4 x - 3}\right) + \lim_{x \to \infty}\left(\frac{4}{4 x^{2} - 4 x - 3}\right) \]
    limit-lawApply the limit law for sums and differences.✓ Proved
  5. \[ = \lim_{x \to \infty} 3 - \lim_{x \to \infty}\left(\frac{12 x}{4 x^{2} - 4 x - 3}\right) + \lim_{x \to \infty}\left(\frac{4}{4 x^{2} - 4 x - 3}\right) \]
    simplifyDivide the numerator and denominator of the first term by x**2.✓ Proved
  6. \[ = 3 - \lim_{x \to \infty}\left(\frac{12 x}{4 x^{2} - 4 x - 3}\right) + \lim_{x \to \infty}\left(\frac{4}{4 x^{2} - 4 x - 3}\right) \]
    simplifySimplify the first limit term.✓ Proved
  7. \[ = 3 \]
    limit simplifyEvaluate the remaining limits as x approaches infinity. Final result.✓ Proved
Answer \( 3 \)

Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where (2*x - 1)**2 - 4 = 0
undefined where 4*x**2 - 4*x - 3 = 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*x**2 - 4*x - 3 = 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*x**2 - 4*x - 3 = 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*x**2 - 4*x - 3 = 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*x**2 - 4*x - 3 = 0
7✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*x**2 - 4*x - 3 = 0
8✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*x**2 - 4*x - 3 = 0
9✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy took the limit from both sides and got the stated value

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) — Step 4 incorrectly labels an algebraic rewrite as a limit‑law application. Splitting the fraction into three terms is a single algebraic manipulation, not a limit law. The label should be "algebra" (or "rewrite"), not "limit-law".
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — Step 6 claims to simplify the first term by dividing by x**2, but the result shown (12/4) is the limit of that term, not an algebraic simplification of the expression inside the Limit operator. The step conflates algebraic manipulation with limit evaluation, violating the 'one rule per step' constraint and mislabeling a limit evaluation as 'simplify'.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-29 — Step 6 claims to simplify the first term by dividing by x**2, but the result shown (12/4) is the limit of that term, not an algebraic simplification of the expression inside the Limit operator. The step conflates algebraic manipulation with limit evaluation, violating the 'one rule per step' constraint and mislabeling a limit evaluation as 'simplify'.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-09-29 — Step 4 incorrectly labels an algebraic rewrite as a limit‑law application. Splitting the fraction into three terms is a single algebraic manipulation, not a limit law. The label should be "algebra" (or "rewrite"), not "limit-law".
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-29 — The solution correctly applies limit laws and algebraic simplifications. Each step changes only one aspect of the expression or applies a single rule, and the labels are appropriate.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-09-29 — Step 4 incorrectly labels the algebraic split of a fraction as a limit‑law. The operation is a single algebraic manipulation, not a limit law. This mislabeling could mislead a student about the appropriate rule to apply.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-29 with SymPy 1.14.0.