Limit of \( \displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{\left(2 x - 1\right)^{2} + 1}}{2 x - 1} \) as \( x \to \infty \)
Problem 1.319 · medium
- \[ \lim_{x \to \infty}\left(\frac{\sqrt{\left(2 x - 1\right)^{2} + 1}}{2 x - 1}\right) \]limitEvaluate the limit of the function as x approaches infinity.✓ Proved
- \[ = \lim_{x \to \infty} \sqrt{1 + \frac{1}{\left(2 x - 1\right)^{2}}} \]algebra simplifyDivide both the numerator and the denominator by (2*x - 1). Simplify the expression inside the square root.✓ Proved
- \[ = \lim_{x \to \infty} 1 \]limit-lawThe term 1/(2*x - 1)**2 approaches 0 as x approaches infinity.✓ Proved
- \[ = 1 \]limitThe limit evaluates to 1.✓ Proved
✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | line 1 is the problem as stated |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 2*x - 1 = 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 2*x - 1 = 0 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 2*x - 1 = 0 |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| answer | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | SymPy took the limit from both sides and got the stated value |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) — Step 2 incorrectly rewrites the expression inside the square root. Dividing the numerator and denominator by (2*x-1) inside the sqrt is not valid; it changes the expression from sqrt((2*x-1)^2+1)/(2*x-1) to sqrt(1+1/(2*x-1)^2), which is not algebraically equivalent. The correct approach would involve factoring (2*x-1)^2 out of the square root and handling the sign of (2*x-1).qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive — reviewer response could not be parsed: { "verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "Step 2 is algebraically incorrect. Dividing the numerator sqrt((2x-1)^2 + 1) by (2x-1) results in sqrt(1 + 1/(2x-1)^2) only if (2x-1) is positive, b
Senior review claude-sonnet-5-5, 2026-10-06: pass — Each step is a valid equality with a legitimate rule name. Rewriting the quotient as a single square root and splitting the fraction is one algebra change. As x->oo, 1/(2x-1)^2 tends to 0, so the limit is sqrt(1)=1, matching the stated answer.
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: dismiss — The objection claims step 2 is wrong, but sqrt(A)/(2x-1) = sqrt(A/(2x-1)^2) holds for 2x-1>0, which is the relevant region as x->oo. SymPy proved the line, and the domain restriction is recorded separately and is not a defect.
Every verdict on record (5)
gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-10-06 — Step 2 incorrectly rewrites the expression inside the square root. Dividing the numerator and denominator by (2*x-1) inside the sqrt is not valid; it changes the expression from sqrt((2*x-1)^2+1)/(2*x-1) to sqrt(1+1/(2*x-1)^2), which is not algebraically equivalent. The correct approach would involve factoring (2*x-1)^2 out of the square root and handling the sign of (2*x-1).qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-06 — reviewer response could not be parsed: { "verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "Step 2 is algebraically incorrect. Dividing the numerator sqrt((2x-1)^2 + 1) by (2x-1) results in sqrt(1 + 1/(2x-1)^2) only if (2x-1) is positive, bclaude-sonnet-5-5: pass 2026-10-06 — Each step is a valid equality with a legitimate rule name. Rewriting the quotient as a single square root and splitting the fraction is one algebra change. As x->oo, 1/(2x-1)^2 tends to 0, so the limit is sqrt(1)=1, matching the stated answer.qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-06 — reviewer response could not be parsed: { "verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "Step 2 incorrectly applies algebraic manipulation. Dividing the numerator sqrt((2x-1)^2 + 1) by (2x-1) does not yield sqrt((2x-1)^2/(2x-1)^2 + 1/(2xgpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-06
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-06 with SymPy 1.14.0.