∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›Limits by factoring›Problem 1.309

Limit of \( \displaystyle \frac{4 x^{2} - 10 x + 6}{2 x - 3} \) as \( x \to \frac{3}{2} \)

Problem 1.309 · medium

Evaluate \( \displaystyle \lim_{x \to \frac{3}{2}} \frac{4 x^{2} - 10 x + 6}{2 x - 3} \).
  1. \[ \lim_{x \to \frac{3}{2}^+}\left(\frac{4 x^{2} - 10 x + 6}{2 x - 3}\right) \]
    limitStart with the limit of the given function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = \lim_{x \to \frac{3}{2}^+}\left(2 x - 2\right) \]
    factor cancelFactor the numerator. Cancel the common factor (2*x - 3).✓ Proved
  3. \[ = 1 \]
    substitution simplifySubstitute x = 3/2 into the simplified expression. Evaluate the final numerical value.✓ Proved
Answer \( 1 \)

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 2*x - 3 = 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy took the limit from both sides and got the stated value

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly factors the numerator, cancels the common term, and evaluates the limit via substitution. Each step applies a single rule and is correctly labeled.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-06
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-06 — The solution correctly factors the numerator, cancels the common term, and evaluates the limit via substitution. Each step applies a single rule and is correctly labeled.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-06
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-06

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-06 with SymPy 1.14.0.