Limit of \( \displaystyle \frac{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} - 1}{2 x + 2 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1} \) as \( x \to \infty \)
Problem 1.167 · hard
Evaluate \( \displaystyle \lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} - 1}{2 x + 2 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1} \).
- \[ \lim_{x \to \infty}\left(\frac{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} - 1}{2 x + 2 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}\right) \]limit algebraStart with the limit of the given function. Rearrange the denominator terms.✓ Proved
- \[ = \lim_{x \to \infty}\left(\frac{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} - 1}{8 x^{2} + 10 x + 3}\right) \]simplify simplify simplifyExpand the squared term in the denominator. Distribute the 2 in the denominator. Combine like terms in the denominator.✓ Proved
- \[ = \lim_{x \to \infty}\left(\frac{16 x^{2} + 16 x + 3}{8 x^{2} + 10 x + 3}\right) \]simplify simplifyExpand the squared term in the numerator. Simplify the numerator.✓ Proved
- \[ = \lim_{x \to \infty}\left(\frac{16 x^{2}}{8 x^{2} + 10 x + 3} + \frac{16 x}{8 x^{2} + 10 x + 3} + \frac{3}{8 x^{2} + 10 x + 3}\right) \]limit-lawSplit the fraction into three parts.✓ Proved
- \[ = \lim_{x \to \infty}\left(\frac{16 x}{8 x^{2} + 10 x + 3}\right) + \lim_{x \to \infty}\left(\frac{16 x^{2}}{8 x^{2} + 10 x + 3}\right) + \lim_{x \to \infty}\left(\frac{3}{8 x^{2} + 10 x + 3}\right) \]limit-lawApply the sum rule for limits.✓ Proved
- \[ = 2 \]limitEvaluate each limit term separately.✓ Proved
Answer \( 2 \)
✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | line 1 is the problem as stated |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 2*x + 2*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 2*x + 2*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0 undefined where 8*x**2 + 10*x + 3 = 0 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 8*x**2 + 10*x + 3 = 0 |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 8*x**2 + 10*x + 3 = 0 |
| 6 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 8*x**2 + 10*x + 3 = 0 |
| 7 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 8*x**2 + 10*x + 3 = 0 |
| 8 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 8*x**2 + 10*x + 3 = 0 |
| 9 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 8*x**2 + 10*x + 3 = 0 |
| 10 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 8*x**2 + 10*x + 3 = 0 |
| answer | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | SymPy took the limit from both sides and got the stated value |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly expands and simplifies the rational function, applies limit laws to split the sum, and evaluates the limits of the individual terms. Each step changes only one aspect of the expression and uses valid labels from the fixed vocabulary.
Every verdict on record (4)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-04 — The solution correctly expands and simplifies the rational function, applies limit laws to split the sum, and evaluates the limits of the individual terms. Each step changes only one aspect of the expression and uses valid labels from the fixed vocabulary.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-04qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-04 — The solution correctly expands and simplifies the rational function before splitting it into terms to evaluate the limit at infinity. Each step applies a single rule and uses valid labels from the fixed vocabulary.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-04
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-04 with SymPy 1.14.0.