20 practice problems across the topics a Calculus 3 final usually covers, in course order,
each with a worked solution checked line by line. Your own exam may differ, so check your syllabus.
Try each problem on paper before opening its solution. If one gives you trouble, the topic link above
it has more like it. How we verify
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 1 proved, 4 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
Find \( \displaystyle \mathbf{u} \times \mathbf{v} \) for \( \displaystyle \mathbf{u} = \langle -1, 2, -2 \rangle,\ \mathbf{v} = \langle 2, -4, -4 \rangle \), and the area of the parallelogram they span.
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 3 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 5 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 3 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
Answer \( \mathbf r(t) = \left\langle - t - \cos{\left(t \right)} + 2, - t + \sin{\left(t \right)} + 2, \frac{t^{2}}{2} - 2 t - 2 \right\rangle \)
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 4 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
Let \( \displaystyle z = x \cos{\left(y \right)} + y e^{x} \) with \( \displaystyle x = s t \), \( \displaystyle y = s + t \). Find \( \displaystyle \frac{\partial z}{\partial s} \) at \( \displaystyle s = 1 \), \( \displaystyle t = 1 \).
\[ \left[\begin{matrix}\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left(x \cos{\left(y \right)} + y e^{x}\right)\\\frac{\partial}{\partial y} \left(x \cos{\left(y \right)} + y e^{x}\right)\end{matrix}\right] = \left[\begin{matrix}y e^{x} + \cos{\left(y \right)}\\- x \sin{\left(y \right)} + e^{x}\end{matrix}\right] \]
∂z/∂x and ∂z/∂y.✓ Proved
∂z/∂s = (∂z/∂x)(∂x/∂s) + (∂z/∂y)(∂y/∂s).
Reviewed
\[ - \sin{\left(2 \right)} + \cos{\left(2 \right)} + 3 e = \sqrt{2} \cos{\left(\frac{\pi}{4} + 2 \right)} + 3 e \]
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
Find the directional derivative of \( \displaystyle f(x, y) = \sqrt{x^{2} + y^{2}} \) at \( \displaystyle (-1, 1) \) in the direction of \( \displaystyle \langle 1, 1 \rangle \).
A contour map of f(x, y) = sqrt(x² + y²): each curve joins points where f has the same value. At (-1, 1) the gradient arrow points straight uphill, across the contours, and the direction of travel is drawn beside it.
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 1 proved, 3 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 2 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
Find and classify the critical points of \( \displaystyle f(x, y) = x^{2} - 2 x - y^{2} + 4 y - 3 \).
\[ \left[\begin{matrix}\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left(x^{2} - 2 x - y^{2} + 4 y - 3\right)\\\frac{\partial}{\partial y} \left(x^{2} - 2 x - y^{2} + 4 y - 3\right)\end{matrix}\right] = \left[\begin{matrix}2 x - 2\\4 - 2 y\end{matrix}\right] \]
The partial derivatives.✓ Proved
\[ \left[\begin{matrix}0\\0\end{matrix}\right] \]
Both vanish at (1, 2), the only solution.Reviewed
\[ -4 \]
D = f_xx f_yy − f_xy².Reviewed
D = -4 < 0: a saddle point.
Reviewed
Answer \( \text{saddle point at } (1, 2) \)
A contour map of f(x, y) = x² - 2x - y² + 4y - 3: each curve joins points where f has the same value. The contours close in around the critical point (1, 2).
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 1 proved, 3 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
A contour map of f(x, y) = 4x + y: each curve joins points where f has the same value. The constraint circle of radius 5 is drawn over it; the largest and smallest values on the circle are where a level line just touches it.
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 3 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
Evaluate \( \displaystyle \iint_D x^{2} \, dA \) where D is bounded by \( \displaystyle y = 0 \), \( \displaystyle y = \sqrt{x} \), \( \displaystyle x = 0 \) and \( \displaystyle x = 2 \).
D is Type I: for each x in [0, 2], y runs from 0 to sqrt(x).
Reviewed
\[ \int\limits_{0}^{\sqrt{x}} x^{2}\, dy = x^{\frac{5}{2}} \]
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
The iterated integral factors into three one-variable integrals.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{16 \pi}{3} \approx 16.75516 \)
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 1 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 3 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
Use Green's theorem to evaluate \( \displaystyle \oint_C (x^{2} - y)\,dx + (x + y^{2})\,dy \), where C is the boundary of the rectangle \( \displaystyle [0, 3] \times [0, 1] \), counterclockwise.
Green's theorem: ∮ P dx + Q dy = ∬ (∂Q/∂x − ∂P/∂y) dA.
\[ \int\limits_{0}^{1}\int\limits_{0}^{3} 2\, dx\, dy = 6 \]
Integrate over the rectangle.✓ Proved
Answer \( 6 \)
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
Use the divergence theorem to find the outward flux of \( \displaystyle \mathbf F = \left(y z\right)\mathbf i + \left(- 2 y\right)\mathbf j + \left(0\right)\mathbf k \) across the sphere \( \displaystyle x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1 \).
\[ \frac{d}{d z} 0 + \frac{d}{d y} \left(- 2 y\right) + \frac{\partial}{\partial x} y z = -2 \]
div F.✓ Proved
Flux out of a closed surface = ∭ div F dV over the solid inside it (in spherical coordinates).
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify
Use Stokes' theorem to evaluate \( \displaystyle \oint_C \mathbf F \cdot d\mathbf r \) for \( \displaystyle \mathbf F = \left\langle - y, x, z \right\rangle \), where \( \displaystyle C \) is the circle \( \displaystyle x^2 + y^2 = 4 \) in the plane \( \displaystyle z = 0 \), counterclockwise seen from above.
Take S to be the flat disk the circle bounds, with upward normal k. Stokes: ∮_C F · dr = ∬_S (curl F) · k dA.
The k-component of the curl over the disk, in polar coordinates.✓ Proved
\[ \int\limits_{0}^{2 \pi} 4\, dt = 8 \pi \]
The circulation computed directly around C agrees.✓ Proved
Answer \( 8 \pi \)
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 3 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. The full receipt ·
How we verify